Re: LM628
Posted by
me
on 1999-06-18 10:17:54 UTC
Mike Romine wrote:
though. In position mode I usually got trajectory updates at several milliseconds but they insist
that < 1 millisecond can be done with their low level routines. I like the 100 microseconds or
so quoted for EMC much better though! Even 1 millisecond at the high feed rates of a cnc router
could result in several thousanths position error in interpolated moves.
Leslie M. Watts
ITW Advanced Technology Center
> But given how fast and cheap the 16 and 32 bit microcontrollers areI talked to tech80 about the PMD chipset as they also use it. They seemed to prefer the LM628/629
> getting now-a-days, I have come to believe closing the loop in firmware
> on a processor is the way to go for a ground up system.
>
though. In position mode I usually got trajectory updates at several milliseconds but they insist
that < 1 millisecond can be done with their low level routines. I like the 100 microseconds or
so quoted for EMC much better though! Even 1 millisecond at the high feed rates of a cnc router
could result in several thousanths position error in interpolated moves.
Leslie M. Watts
ITW Advanced Technology Center
Discussion Thread
Leslie Watts
1999-06-17 15:32:52 UTC
Re: LM628
Mike Romine
1999-06-17 19:08:21 UTC
Re: LM628
me
1999-06-18 10:17:54 UTC
Re: LM628