limit switches: mech vs proximity
Posted by
jmw@c...
on 2000-11-20 00:38:05 UTC
Is there a strong reason to prefer one type over another, if either
was compatible w/ the control system?
As WallyK has pointed out in off-board comm, mech types can be set up
to have lots of overtravel, but prox sw's have to get pretty close to
the target before tripping--hence the possibility of crashing them.
Prox sw's are conveniently small, while industrial grade mechanical
units are like a pack of smokes cut in half the long way. Maybe a
prox sw could be mounted on a spring mechanism to protect it?
Voice of experience?
Thanks very much.
--Jack W.
was compatible w/ the control system?
As WallyK has pointed out in off-board comm, mech types can be set up
to have lots of overtravel, but prox sw's have to get pretty close to
the target before tripping--hence the possibility of crashing them.
Prox sw's are conveniently small, while industrial grade mechanical
units are like a pack of smokes cut in half the long way. Maybe a
prox sw could be mounted on a spring mechanism to protect it?
Voice of experience?
Thanks very much.
--Jack W.
Discussion Thread
jmw@c...
2000-11-20 00:38:05 UTC
limit switches: mech vs proximity
ballendo@y...
2000-11-20 01:01:13 UTC
re:limit switches: mech vs proximity
jmw@c...
2000-11-20 02:10:45 UTC
Re: re:limit switches: mech vs proximity
ptengin@a...
2000-11-20 02:19:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] limit switches: mech vs proximity
wilfried.fedtke@t...
2000-11-20 09:54:21 UTC
limit switches: mech vs proximity
Ray
2000-11-20 10:45:44 UTC
Re: limit switches: mech vs proximity
marble here
2000-11-20 14:08:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] limit switches: mech vs proximity