Re: tantalum caps
Posted by
Mariss Freimanis
on 2000-11-21 08:42:07 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, Jon Elson <jmelson@a...> wrote:
I agree. What amazed me though was the ceramic caps volumetric parity
with Ta caps.
Just for fun I measured the ERS for ceramic, tantalum and aluminum
caps. Each cap was 4.7uF/16V
1) Aluminum 1.285 ohms
2) Tantalum 0.410 ohms
3) Ceramic 0.015 ohms
The measured inductance of the ceramic cap was a fantastic 7nH.
Mariss
>coefficient,
>
> Well, you have the choice of C0G for tightest temperature
> but only in small capacitance values, Z5U for a pretty low tempcoeff
> on larger values, and the Y5V for the greatest capacitance fordecoupling
> use only.Hi,
>
> Jon
I agree. What amazed me though was the ceramic caps volumetric parity
with Ta caps.
Just for fun I measured the ERS for ceramic, tantalum and aluminum
caps. Each cap was 4.7uF/16V
1) Aluminum 1.285 ohms
2) Tantalum 0.410 ohms
3) Ceramic 0.015 ohms
The measured inductance of the ceramic cap was a fantastic 7nH.
Mariss
Discussion Thread
ballendo@y...
2000-11-20 20:28:18 UTC
re:Re: tantalum caps
Jon Elson
2000-11-20 21:53:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] tantalum caps
Wally K
2000-11-21 02:43:11 UTC
re:Re: tantalum caps
Mariss Freimanis
2000-11-21 08:42:07 UTC
Re: tantalum caps
Jon Elson
2000-11-21 12:07:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tantalum caps