re: tachs wasRe: re:cleaning, lovejoy, black box, etc.

Jeff,

Me too! I've been wondering...

Ballendo

>Ballendo, Jon, et all,
>Mariss seems to make the Gecko 320 get along without a tach, though.
>Hope he jumps in here.
>Jeff
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 08:59:39 -0000, Ballendo wrote:
>>As explained in a previous thread: At slow speeds, the tach is more
>>accurate and reads direct. The pulse average-ing (to derive speed)
>>suffers from data starvation. (not enough pulses per unit of time
>>to ACCURATELY reflect the "real world" happenings at the axes)