Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes was Re: Pulse Gen
Posted by
dave engvall
on 2000-12-06 19:37:37 UTC
Jeff Barlow wrote:
90% of the time and then if that isn't fast enough do it in hardware.
Better algorithms in either hardware or software can be most impressive.
Dave
> Alan,I might rephrase that: profile the system in software and find out what take the most time. Recode that 10% or so that is taking
>
> It's Donald Knuth, IIRC.
>
> Hold on there, I didn't say anything about circular interpolation in
> hardware. That's a whole other can of worms.
>
> The trick has always been to find the smallest part of a system that
> really has to be fast, and do only that part in hardware.
>
> Jeff
90% of the time and then if that isn't fast enough do it in hardware.
Better algorithms in either hardware or software can be most impressive.
Dave
Discussion Thread
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-12-06 18:40:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes was Re: Pulse Gen
Jeff Barlow
2000-12-06 18:54:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes was Re: Pulse Gen
dave engvall
2000-12-06 19:37:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes was Re: Pulse Gen