Re: Sampling Theorem
Posted by
Lee Studley
on 2000-12-07 10:40:56 UTC
The Nyquist criteria in sampling a frequency is >= 2f for frequency
information, but to get phase information you must go higher by a
factor of the resolution you are interested in storing.
-Lee (just to muddy the waters...)
information, but to get phase information you must go higher by a
factor of the resolution you are interested in storing.
-Lee (just to muddy the waters...)
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, "Smoke" <Smoke@5...> wrote:
> Sounds like a corollary to Murphy's law to me!
>
> Smoke
>
> >There is a (somehow) related theoretical result in economics:
Under a
> >very plausible set of assumptions, _and in spite of repeated
> >disappointment_ everything takes e times as long to finish as
> >originally estimated.
> >
> >--Jack
> >>
Discussion Thread
jmw@c...
2000-12-07 02:24:47 UTC
Sampling Theorem
Smoke
2000-12-07 06:52:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Sampling Theorem
Lee Studley
2000-12-07 10:40:56 UTC
Re: Sampling Theorem