Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Capacitor Sizing in Power Supplies
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-12-07 13:00:38 UTC
jmw@... wrote:
leakage inductance (which signifies poor coupling between primary
and secondary) will be a little higher than the previous winding, but
it would come close.
in series, giving a loss of about 1.4 V, so the rectifier will lose about as
much energy as there is delivered to the load.
it gets.
the diodes stop conducting, and the capacitor voltage starts to drop
(due to the load continuing to draw current). As the line voltage comes
back toward a peak, the secondary voltage reaches a point where it is
higher than the capacitor voltage plus the 2 diode voltage drops, and the
diodes begin to conduct again. The line voltage continues to rise for a bit,
and the current flow from the secondary, through the diodes to the
capacitor can be quite large, depending on the series resistance of
the whole circuit and the transformer leakage inductance. These pulse
currents repeat 120 times a second, and can be very large, sometimes
10 to 100 TIMES the steady state current draw from the capacitor.
3 of them need 3 x voltage, at 1/3rd the current.
it is to voltage fluctuation. In this case, you should have a LOT of
leeway.
Jon
> Jan, Jon, Mariss: Thanks very much for your replies to my cap sizingPretty close! The 2 turns don't properly fill the 'window', and so
> question. I am indeed attempting to make a power supply for formerly
> series wound, and now independently engergized DC motors.
>
> I found a nice stout-looking transformer rated 120 VAC in and 12 VAC
> @ 30 A out. There were 40 turns of 1/8" x 1/8" square wire on the
> secondary which I replaced with 2 turns of #4 copper wire. I don't
> know if such big wire was required, but it looks very impressive.
> Anyway, I fired it up and 1.2 volts, nice and steady, everything
> running cool, no fuses blowing--all at no load.
>
> Surley this thing would not be capable of 1.2 VAC @ 300 A?
leakage inductance (which signifies poor coupling between primary
and secondary) will be a little higher than the previous winding, but
it would come close.
>Now, note that when the bridge rectifier is conducting, there are two diodes
> I next connected one of C&H's magic 600V @ 40A $4.95 butter pat
> rectifiers and a 43K uF cap which happened to be on hand and read
> very close to 1.2 * 1.4 VDC.
in series, giving a loss of about 1.4 V, so the rectifier will lose about as
much energy as there is delivered to the load.
> I doubt the motors' simultaneous amp draw would ever exceed theThey do not parallel well, and the lower a voltage you go to, the worse
> nameplate rating of the rectifier, but can full wave lumps be
> connected in parallel, or does one just hunt down a bigger unit?
it gets.
> Jon, I'm concerned re your comments about current surges in theEvery time the line voltage passes through zero (120 times a second)
> secondary--what would cause such surges and how could they be
> controlled?
the diodes stop conducting, and the capacitor voltage starts to drop
(due to the load continuing to draw current). As the line voltage comes
back toward a peak, the secondary voltage reaches a point where it is
higher than the capacitor voltage plus the 2 diode voltage drops, and the
diodes begin to conduct again. The line voltage continues to rise for a bit,
and the current flow from the secondary, through the diodes to the
capacitor can be quite large, depending on the series resistance of
the whole circuit and the transformer leakage inductance. These pulse
currents repeat 120 times a second, and can be very large, sometimes
10 to 100 TIMES the steady state current draw from the capacitor.
> I hadn't hought about connecting the field coils of the axes motorsWell, two of them in series need 2 x the voltage at 1/2 the current.
> in series. Suppose just X any Y were connected in series (Z is
> another installment)--how might this affect the voltage requirements?
> Maybe a couple more turns of #4?
3 of them need 3 x voltage, at 1/3rd the current.
> Jan, would you say the 1k uF per amp independent of voltage is aHmmm, it totally depends on the character of the load, and how sensitive
> working rule of thumb most practical power supply designers would
> agree with?
it is to voltage fluctuation. In this case, you should have a LOT of
leeway.
Jon
Discussion Thread
jmw@c...
2000-12-03 05:12:00 UTC
Capacitor Sizing in Power Supplies
Mariss Freimanis
2000-12-03 09:02:40 UTC
Re: Capacitor Sizing in Power Supplies
JanRwl@A...
2000-12-03 12:51:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Capacitor Sizing in Power Supplies
Jon Elson
2000-12-03 23:00:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Capacitor Sizing in Power Supplies
jmw@c...
2000-12-07 01:57:05 UTC
Re: Capacitor Sizing in Power Supplies
Jon Elson
2000-12-07 13:00:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Capacitor Sizing in Power Supplies