Re: "metric" ballscrews? , and other misc.
Posted by
ballendo@y...
on 2000-12-09 12:38:13 UTC
Smoke wrote:
I believe you misunderstood my explanation re: CncPRO.
The program "sets" a really low "top speed" through some internally
derived algorithm, which seems to have no REAL basis. In other words,
there appears to be some mistake(s) in the basic mathematical
assumptions used by the program. For slower (hobby machinist)
feedrates, it does not present a problem, but for faster speeds, it
can.
Sure, you could set up a 1:6 ratio and use a "fast" leadscrew, but
then the motors/drivers become unwieldy.
Hope this helps.
Ballendo
>600 IPM is obtainable even using the "artificial limits". TheSmoke,
>secret lies is in the mechanics, not the electronics.
>Start with a faster pitch lead screw and work from there.
I believe you misunderstood my explanation re: CncPRO.
The program "sets" a really low "top speed" through some internally
derived algorithm, which seems to have no REAL basis. In other words,
there appears to be some mistake(s) in the basic mathematical
assumptions used by the program. For slower (hobby machinist)
feedrates, it does not present a problem, but for faster speeds, it
can.
Sure, you could set up a 1:6 ratio and use a "fast" leadscrew, but
then the motors/drivers become unwieldy.
Hope this helps.
Ballendo
Discussion Thread
ballendo@y...
2000-12-09 12:38:13 UTC
Re: "metric" ballscrews? , and other misc.
Smoke
2000-12-09 13:59:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: "metric" ballscrews? , and other misc.