Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code user variables; convention?
Posted by
dave engvall
on 2001-01-04 22:38:22 UTC
Jon Elson wrote:
Just speaking without a good command (pun intended) of g-code structure.
Dave
>Aren't all the commands one letter so strlen() would do it?
>
> Right! How will you keep named variables from being confused with
> the command words, that use many of the alphabetic characters?
>
> Jon
Just speaking without a good command (pun intended) of g-code structure.
Dave
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
2001-01-04 21:47:21 UTC
Re: G-code user variables; convention?
dave engvall
2001-01-04 22:38:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code user variables; convention?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-04 23:22:06 UTC
Re: G-code user variables; convention?
Brian Pitt
2001-01-05 01:41:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code user variables; convention?
Brian Pitt
2001-01-05 02:16:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code user variables; convention?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-05 13:28:35 UTC
Re: G-code user variables; convention?
Brian Pitt
2001-01-05 23:41:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code user variables; convention?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-06 11:31:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code user variables; convention?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-06 14:46:30 UTC
Re: G-code user variables; convention?
Brian Pitt
2001-01-06 17:41:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code user variables; convention?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-06 23:16:52 UTC
Re: Re: G-code user variables; convention?
Brian Pitt
2001-01-07 01:00:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: G-code user variables; convention?