Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:EMC versions
Posted by
Paul
on 2001-03-12 12:45:00 UTC
Hi Dave
I now have 2.2.18-rtl3.0 up and running without problems - Have also had
2.4.2-rtl3.0 on test.
The 4th March CVS download also compiles without any problems.
All the realtime tests run without a hitch under 2.2.18-rtl3.0 and the ones I
ran on the latest kernel worked. - Still have a few more to run.
Not sure which kernel to put in the BDI CD - Perhaps use the 2.2.18 for the
basic install, and put the 2.4.2 sources in a bleeding edge directory.
Regards, Paul.
I now have 2.2.18-rtl3.0 up and running without problems - Have also had
2.4.2-rtl3.0 on test.
The 4th March CVS download also compiles without any problems.
All the realtime tests run without a hitch under 2.2.18-rtl3.0 and the ones I
ran on the latest kernel worked. - Still have a few more to run.
Not sure which kernel to put in the BDI CD - Perhaps use the 2.2.18 for the
basic install, and put the 2.4.2 sources in a bleeding edge directory.
Regards, Paul.
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, dave engvall wrote:
> Hi group,
> What version/(date) of emc are people having good
> success with?
>
> I finally got a good build on 2.2.14; at least I
> can get fp and measurements to run. Measurements
> runs with numbers between 14000 - 34000 (P166)
> considerably better than previous builds where the
> numbers were way too high. Frank doesn't want to
> run and reports that it cannot open /dev/rtf1
> which is definitely there. Ideas?
> Does this really matter?
>
> Now all I have to do is pick a version of emc and
> get with the program. NPI :-)
Discussion Thread
dave engvall
2001-03-12 08:37:25 UTC
Re:EMC versions
Paul
2001-03-12 12:45:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:EMC versions
Ray
2001-03-13 10:01:04 UTC
Re: Re: EMC versions