Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport MDI update
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-07-06 10:00:40 UTC
machines@... wrote:
work,
it could be a problem, or could be a perfect solution. If muck of your
work is similar to common manual machining tasks, drilling holes,
facing off surfaces, rectangular pockets, this should do fine. I find
I do a LOT of boring out round holes, and would be pretty lost without
at least full 2D capability. 3D is nice to have, but I very rarely use it.
Jon
>Ah, that is a totally different situation. Still, based on the type of
> Jon,
> I looked carefully at this and after watching my full CNC machine do
> 3 consecutive jobs and other than going to the start position which
> was a diagonal move ALL the other moves were linear one axis moves.
> You have to realise that this is not my first and main CNC machine
> but is one bought to take some of the work off the big Beaver.
work,
it could be a problem, or could be a perfect solution. If muck of your
work is similar to common manual machining tasks, drilling holes,
facing off surfaces, rectangular pockets, this should do fine. I find
I do a LOT of boring out round holes, and would be pretty lost without
at least full 2D capability. 3D is nice to have, but I very rarely use it.
Jon
Discussion Thread
machines@n...
2001-07-05 17:54:59 UTC
Bridgeport MDI update
Tim Goldstein
2001-07-05 20:11:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport MDI update
Jon Elson
2001-07-05 21:02:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport MDI update
machines@n...
2001-07-06 00:42:40 UTC
Re: Bridgeport MDI update
Jon Elson
2001-07-06 10:00:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport MDI update
ballendo@y...
2001-07-06 20:57:33 UTC
index table was Re: Bridgeport MDI update