Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport BOSS upgrade
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-07-16 10:43:11 UTC
Tim Goldstein wrote:
then the microstepping would be providing precisely calculated currents that
were totally wrong for the forces developed in the motor. It never ocurred
to me that only ONE SET of magnets could be damaged! This makes some
things suddenly become clear!
Jon
> I did some experimenting on Bridgett my Boss equipped series II with G210aOF COURSE! If the magnets for the two windings were not very evenly matched,
> and the original Bridgeport stepper motors. I found that 2 of the motors
> microstepped just fine with great positional accuracy and power, but that
> the 3rd motor worked like crap microstepping. The motor that was bad on
> microstep did perform well on full steps. Richard from Ahha had posted some
> info about the motors on Bridgeports getting damaged from the original
> drives failing or overheating of the motors. The result was that the motor
> was partial demagnetized and microstepping performance would be diminished
> and id you try turning the motor by hand you will feel little detent effect.
> My poor performing motor exhibited exactly what Richard explained.
then the microstepping would be providing precisely calculated currents that
were totally wrong for the forces developed in the motor. It never ocurred
to me that only ONE SET of magnets could be damaged! This makes some
things suddenly become clear!
Jon
Discussion Thread
ace@d...
2001-07-15 19:39:49 UTC
Bridgeport BOSS upgrade
garyswindell@h...
2001-07-16 08:17:43 UTC
Re: Bridgeport BOSS upgrade
Tim Goldstein
2001-07-16 08:47:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport BOSS upgrade
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-07-16 08:48:11 UTC
Re: Bridgeport BOSS upgrade
Jon Elson
2001-07-16 10:39:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport BOSS upgrade
Jon Elson
2001-07-16 10:43:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport BOSS upgrade
garyswindell@h...
2001-07-16 10:47:32 UTC
Re: Bridgeport BOSS upgrade