Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine inaccuracies fixed by software compensation
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-09-05 10:48:13 UTC
Carol & Jerry Jankura wrote:
barring losing a step, they will be quite repeatable. What we were
discussing is what the 5% is referred to. I still dispute the 5% being
referred only to the theoretical position of a step, as that means the
position is within 5% of 1/200 of a revolution, or .05 x .005 = .00025
or .025% of a revolution. That seems too high for a general production
device. I suspect there is a local cumulative effect, where slight
positioning or magnet strength errors in the rotor combine with slight
centering errors in the stator iron laminations to produce errors that
repeat every rotation.
Jon
> Doug:Oh, its clearly NOT cumilative, the steps are built into the motor, and
>
> Isn't the 5% error rating on the motor the positional accuracy of the last
> step, and not cumulative?
barring losing a step, they will be quite repeatable. What we were
discussing is what the 5% is referred to. I still dispute the 5% being
referred only to the theoretical position of a step, as that means the
position is within 5% of 1/200 of a revolution, or .05 x .005 = .00025
or .025% of a revolution. That seems too high for a general production
device. I suspect there is a local cumulative effect, where slight
positioning or magnet strength errors in the rotor combine with slight
centering errors in the stator iron laminations to produce errors that
repeat every rotation.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
2001-09-04 22:39:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine inaccuracies fixed by software compensation
Doug Fortune
2001-09-04 23:02:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine inaccuracies fixed by software compensation
Brian Pitt
2001-09-04 23:41:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine inaccuracies fixed by software compensation
Ian Wright
2001-09-05 08:45:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine inaccuracies fixed by software compensation
vrsculptor@h...
2001-09-05 10:37:03 UTC
Re: machine inaccuracies fixed by software compensation
Jon Elson
2001-09-05 10:48:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine inaccuracies fixed by software compensation
Jon Elson
2001-09-05 10:52:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine inaccuracies fixed by software compensation
Ray
2001-09-05 12:39:25 UTC
Re: machine inaccuracies fixed by software compensation
Jon Anderson
2001-09-05 13:02:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine inaccuracies fixed by software compensation
Jon Elson
2001-09-05 17:44:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine inaccuracies fixed by software compensation
Jon Elson
2001-09-05 18:00:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: machine inaccuracies fixed by software compensation