Re: Motor Coupling - Was: unbalanced load
Posted by
cadcamcenter@y...
on 2001-09-05 18:38:16 UTC
John Stevenson wrote:
to absorb impulse shock (leading a a very tiny "time-lag"?
The gadget must be machined to very tight tolerance? which mean that
it will not help if the shafts are not coaxial?
Peter
> What was needed was something nearly rigid but with no free play. Ithis
> made the first one up and tried it and it worked fine. On seeing
> the manufacturers changed to a solid one piece nylon coupling butNice gadget you made. Is the main objective of the nylon intermediary
> these just sheared the keyways and grub screws. We came to an
> arangement and they now fit this type shown.
to absorb impulse shock (leading a a very tiny "time-lag"?
The gadget must be machined to very tight tolerance? which mean that
it will not help if the shafts are not coaxial?
Peter
Discussion Thread
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-09-05 08:40:44 UTC
unbalanced load
info.host@b...
2001-09-05 11:47:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] unbalanced load
machines@n...
2001-09-05 14:16:41 UTC
Motor Coupling - Was: unbalanced load
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-09-05 18:38:16 UTC
Re: Motor Coupling - Was: unbalanced load
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-09-05 18:44:04 UTC
Re: unbalanced load
machines@n...
2001-09-06 00:45:24 UTC
Re: Motor Coupling - Was: unbalanced load
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-09-07 15:10:32 UTC
unbalanced load
machines@n...
2001-09-07 15:36:58 UTC
Re: unbalanced load