Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question No. 1
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-09-07 22:01:16 UTC
sutherland_oz@... wrote:
endmills while fooling around with the machine and not watching what
i was doing. Limit switches wouldn't have prevented any of that.
Jon
> Hi Jon, thanks for both the e-mail & the post, I don't know how IWell, I have knocked the head out of tram and broken off a few
> missed the post reply, I,m going to be using steppers, open loop, so
> I see now that a run away condition is unlikely to be due to a
> hardware failure however a software problem (my own carelessness)
> could lead to damage.
endmills while fooling around with the machine and not watching what
i was doing. Limit switches wouldn't have prevented any of that.
> Am I correct in assuming that apart from end ofYes, I think so.
> travel, & a home switch, everything else can be taken care of by
> software control?
> As I,m not looking for speed, but accuracy, thereI've used this trick a few times, and also have seen it in other systems.
> will be a fair degree of reduction between motor & table, so this
> makes your suggestion of motor mounted switch "anded" to a table
> position home switch very attractive, thanks for the info, Ian
> Sutherland.
Jon
Discussion Thread
sutherland_oz@y...
2001-09-05 08:29:05 UTC
Question No. 1
Jon Elson
2001-09-06 10:21:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question No. 1
Jon Elson
2001-09-07 22:01:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question No. 1