Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] new paradigm 6+3=9 bits: three S&D drives, 8 axes... , 3 bits spare
Posted by
Smoke
on 2001-09-23 21:08:30 UTC
Let me know when you get all the kinks worked out, Doug. I'll probably want
to try it out on my DreamMachine
Smoke
to try it out on my DreamMachine
Smoke
> > I'm guessing your router kit could be set up using four axis and still
> > leave pinout room for spindle on, etc?
>
> Yes, the 6+3=9 scheme allows for 8 axes. You could have just four,
> and if this 'device' costs less than one driver (because you only need
> three drivers), you would be ahead. Actually, you'd probably only need
> two physical drivers, if you moved Z in a block separately from X & Y.
>
> But I am expecting to have many more than four.... perhaps 6,7 or 8.
> Implicit in my concept, but unstated in my original posting was that
> when an axis is not active (ie not connected to one of the 3 drivers),
> there is a dummy current fed to it in order for that motor to act
> as a brake and hold its position (especially the vertical axes which
> like to move on their own from gravity).
>
> > Could it then be used for a milling machine instead and the
> > axis switched as desired via any method we want (I'd switch
> > them using rotary gang switches.
>
> Sure, but you miss my point... I would be switching some of them
> at millisecond intervals (to simulate fulltime control of N axes).
>
> Even cycling the most heavily used axis (say X axis) amongst the
> three drivers to distribute the heat dissipation (and thus increase
> the equipments longetivity) is feasible.
>
> Doug Fortune
> http://www.cncKITS.com
>
>
Discussion Thread
Smoke
2001-09-23 21:08:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] new paradigm 6+3=9 bits: three S&D drives, 8 axes... , 3 bits spare
Smoke
2001-09-24 16:40:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: new paradigm 6+3=9 bits: three S&D drives, 8 axes... , 3 bits spare