CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Basic G-Code Question

Posted by Art Fenerty
on 2001-10-18 18:32:48 UTC
Daniel:

The code should be fine. The redundant use of the codes for axis already
in position should not matter, but many implementations vary in slight ways.
You might want to report this to the author of the program as a bug report.
He will probably thank you for the input and make up a repair on the next
version.

Good luck,
Art
Master5 Software
http://users.andara.com/~fenerty/master.htm

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Statman" <dan.statman@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:40 PM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Basic G-Code Question


> I have a very basic G-Code question. My CNC has only been up and running
> for about 10 days, and I have about 10 days experience with G-Code, ;-).
>
> I was programming a series of moves to create a Greek-Key pattern which is
a
> sequence of horizontal and vertical lines only (although arranged in an
> interesting pattern). I was able to complete the task and the result can
be
> viewed at the following link:
>
> http://members.rennlist.com/statmandesigns/P2_Close.jpg
>
> I generated the coordinates in a Microsoft Excel document and then
converted
> that to a G-Code program. The successive data points are always redundant
> in one of the two coordinates since you always move in either a vertical
or
> horizontal straight line. If you are sitting at the point (0,0) and you
> want to move to (0, .250) then the G-code would simply be:
> G01 Y0.250
>
> But is it wrong to specify both the X and Y coordinate if the X coordinate
> is not moving. In other words, will this line of G-code result in the
same
> movement:
> G01 X0 Y0.250
>
> When converting the Excel data I ended up with both coordinates on every
> line of G-code even though one of the two was always redundant. I am
using
> TurboCNC to control my stepper motors and it would not work with both
> coordinates specified. It would do nothing until the next line of G-code
> and then it would connect with a diagonal line, which is not what I
wanted.
>
> Is this the way all G-Code programs work or is there something peculiar
> about TurboCNC??
>
> Sorry for the long winded question, but I hope it is clear to somebody.
>
> Thanks for ALL of your help in the past several weeks. It is most
> appreciated.
>
> Daniel J. Statman, Statman Designs
> www.statmandesigns.com
>
>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Discussion Thread

Dan Statman 2001-10-18 17:39:11 UTC Basic G-Code Question Art Fenerty 2001-10-18 18:32:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Basic G-Code Question ccs@m... 2001-10-18 19:01:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Basic G-Code Question wanliker@a... 2001-10-18 19:16:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Basic G-Code Question Dan Statman 2001-10-18 20:37:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Basic G-Code Question Jon Elson 2001-10-18 22:44:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Basic G-Code Question dkowalcz@d... 2001-10-19 06:37:09 UTC Re: Basic G-Code Question Dan Statman 2001-10-19 07:01:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Basic G-Code Question wayne_j_hill@y... 2001-10-19 08:37:01 UTC Re: Basic G-Code Question Jon Elson 2001-10-19 11:09:40 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Basic G-Code Question Ray 2001-10-19 14:43:31 UTC Re: Re: Basic G-Code Question