Re: Linux versions
Posted by
Fred Proctor
on 1999-05-21 08:33:20 UTC
Phil Plumbo wrote:
kernel 2.0.36, which comes with Red Hat 5.2. The corresponding kernel
path from New Mexico Tech is 0.9J, although I think 1.0 will work.
If anyone wants to try newer kernels, let me know. Going to one of the
2.2 kernels is a huge change. I'm going to wait a while for that, since
there are loads of EMC fixes waiting for me...
--Fred
>The latest version of Linux on which I've compiled and run the EMC is
> From: psp@... (Phil Plumbo)
>
> >The current version requires a 2.0.36 kernel (or maybe it
> >is just that the Xwindows interface is unreliable with 2.0.33 or so). Anyway,
> >all of us had nasty user interface hangups on 2.0.33, and they all went
> >away once upgraded to 2.0.36
>
> I just browsed ftp.us.kernel.org looking for a linux kernel, and found they
> have versions all the way up to 2.3. They have 2.0.36 which is dated Nov 17
> 1998, and lots of later versions. If anyone has tested EMC with later
> versions let us know, otherwise my software development instincts tell me to
> stick to 2.0.36.
kernel 2.0.36, which comes with Red Hat 5.2. The corresponding kernel
path from New Mexico Tech is 0.9J, although I think 1.0 will work.
If anyone wants to try newer kernels, let me know. Going to one of the
2.2 kernels is a huge change. I'm going to wait a while for that, since
there are loads of EMC fixes waiting for me...
--Fred
Discussion Thread
Phil Plumbo
1999-05-20 04:55:50 UTC
Linux versions
paul@A...
1999-05-20 06:49:54 UTC
Re: Linux versions
Fred Proctor
1999-05-21 08:33:20 UTC
Re: Linux versions