Re: Digest Number 19
Posted by
PTENGIN@x...
on 1999-05-21 22:42:19 UTC
In a message dated 5/21/99 7:00:18 PM Hawaiian Standard Time,
tkulaga@... writes:
<< unless there's software out there to
take advantage of the encoder feedback. I haven't seen any, but then
again, I haven't looked. :)
-Tom Kulaga >>
Tom,
Thanks for the reply. I was looking at the Microkinetics Package. It does
have a provision for encoder feed back. I realize there are two things we are
looking at. One would be lost steps, the other is location error feed back.
If I simply put encoders on my Acme lead screws, I could only keep track of
steps but not error. This is where I was wondering if adding spars would be a
cheaper and/or easier way of accurately positioning the work rather than
ballscrews. I have come to the conclusion that I am barking up the wrong
tree and need to get the ballscrews first. Peter
tkulaga@... writes:
<< unless there's software out there to
take advantage of the encoder feedback. I haven't seen any, but then
again, I haven't looked. :)
-Tom Kulaga >>
Tom,
Thanks for the reply. I was looking at the Microkinetics Package. It does
have a provision for encoder feed back. I realize there are two things we are
looking at. One would be lost steps, the other is location error feed back.
If I simply put encoders on my Acme lead screws, I could only keep track of
steps but not error. This is where I was wondering if adding spars would be a
cheaper and/or easier way of accurately positioning the work rather than
ballscrews. I have come to the conclusion that I am barking up the wrong
tree and need to get the ballscrews first. Peter
Discussion Thread
Tom Kulaga
1999-05-21 22:02:17 UTC
Re: Digest Number 19
PTENGIN@x...
1999-05-21 22:42:19 UTC
Re: Digest Number 19
Dan Mauch
1999-05-22 06:27:34 UTC
Re: Digest Number 19