CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 160VDC G320

Posted by Jon Elson
on 2002-01-12 17:32:36 UTC
Doug Harrison wrote:

> > I have a 160VDC prototype of the G320 that I occasionally run for my
> > own amusement and it works very well indeed. However our lawyers
> > warned us off from putting it in production for the previously
> > mentioned reasons. We pay them the big bucks to see problems I cannot
> > and they earned their money on that one.
> >
> > It disgusts me because it works so well (no xformer).
> >
> > Mariss
>
> Could you design it for 140VDC max with a self destruct feature to prevent
> someone from omitting the transformer?

Really, I think a stenciled warning on the case to not use without
isolation transformer would be good enough. If someone DID get
hurt with it, you could always show that he violated the warning
printed right on the case. If you are working with motion control
gear, you are already providing gear that could get someone hurt.
I agree, this litigious society is a terrible thing for innovation.

Jon

Discussion Thread

Doug Harrison 2002-01-12 08:42:19 UTC [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 160VDC G320 Jon Elson 2002-01-12 17:32:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 160VDC G320 ccs@m... 2002-01-12 20:42:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 160VDC G320 Brian Pitt 2002-01-12 21:00:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 160VDC G320