Re: Too excited to stay quiet!!! (reply to John H)
Posted by
jeffdavis516
on 2002-02-18 17:41:30 UTC
Thanks John,
I will try to answer what I can.
When you watch the video the last part of it when it's machining the
dragon you will notice that it's moving fast. I made a mistake in
the CAM program. I meant to set the IPM to 30 and I did so but there
was a little box above that one that wanted to know the format (IPM,
IPF, IPS etc). Well I did not notice that it was on "inch per
second" IPS. When this posted to the G-code it had the feedrate
command at 1500 or something like that. When I started the finish
cut in CNCPro I noticed how fast it was moving but decieded to let it
go. Lucky for me I only have a P133 laptop running CNCPro. It is
limited to how many pulses it can deliver to the Gecko drives.
CNCPro was reading 131 IPM on the flat portion of the part. I can
get even higher IPM if I had a faster computer but I figure why? it's
running fast enough to scare me!!
The servos are rated at 460 OZ/IN peak. But I have them on a 2:1
ratio which slows them down but makes them stronger.
I don't know what the RPM of the servos are capable of. They are of
course a DC motor, if you take away the encoder and apply power they
should turn at a good clip.
Jeff
I will try to answer what I can.
When you watch the video the last part of it when it's machining the
dragon you will notice that it's moving fast. I made a mistake in
the CAM program. I meant to set the IPM to 30 and I did so but there
was a little box above that one that wanted to know the format (IPM,
IPF, IPS etc). Well I did not notice that it was on "inch per
second" IPS. When this posted to the G-code it had the feedrate
command at 1500 or something like that. When I started the finish
cut in CNCPro I noticed how fast it was moving but decieded to let it
go. Lucky for me I only have a P133 laptop running CNCPro. It is
limited to how many pulses it can deliver to the Gecko drives.
CNCPro was reading 131 IPM on the flat portion of the part. I can
get even higher IPM if I had a faster computer but I figure why? it's
running fast enough to scare me!!
The servos are rated at 460 OZ/IN peak. But I have them on a 2:1
ratio which slows them down but makes them stronger.
I don't know what the RPM of the servos are capable of. They are of
course a DC motor, if you take away the encoder and apply power they
should turn at a good clip.
Jeff
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "John H." <johnhe-uk@s...> wrote:
> That's a cool video Jeff. My brother was just in here watching me
watching a
> video for a £40K+ machining centre and asked 'Why would you ever
need one of
> those.' He isn't one of the enlightened ones. What sort of IPM,
sorry I
> should be talking metric here, are you getting from the machine at
warp
> speed? It's easy to measure something and think 'Hmmm, that in 60
seconds'
> but seeing it actually happening is different. What torque ratings
are the
> servos on?
>
> Now you need to add a fourth axis and make more videos! :) Infact,
make it
> an 8 axis job. I'd really like to see a bigger multi-axis mill on
the go,
> it'd sure be interesting. Probably not so interesting after 10
years running
> one. One last thing, what is the RPM of the servos?
>
> John H.
Discussion Thread
jeffdavis516
2002-02-18 16:06:33 UTC
Too excited to stay quiet!!!
mariss92705
2002-02-18 16:22:11 UTC
Re: Too excited to stay quiet!!!
jeffdavis516
2002-02-18 16:57:50 UTC
Re: Too excited to stay quiet!!!
John H.
2002-02-18 17:10:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Too excited to stay quiet!!!
captnorm3@j...
2002-02-18 17:17:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Too excited to stay quiet!!!
Chris Clough
2002-02-18 17:21:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Too excited to stay quiet!!!
jeffdavis516
2002-02-18 17:41:30 UTC
Re: Too excited to stay quiet!!! (reply to John H)
mariss92705
2002-02-18 17:50:33 UTC
Re: Too excited to stay quiet!!!
jeffdavis516
2002-02-18 19:21:58 UTC
Re: Too excited to stay quiet!!!
audiomaker2000
2002-02-18 19:58:40 UTC
Re: Too excited to stay quiet!!!
wanliker@a...
2002-02-18 21:22:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Too excited to stay quiet!!!
Dan Mauch
2002-02-19 06:52:46 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Too excited to stay quiet!!! (reply to John H)
Drew Rogge
2002-02-19 09:48:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Too excited to stay quiet!!!
jeffdavis516
2002-02-19 10:08:31 UTC
Machine Specs.. was (Too excited to stay quiet!!!)
jeffdavis516
2002-02-19 15:23:23 UTC
Specs of project... was (too excited to stay quiet!!)