Re: Progress!!

> Don,
> No, and Yes - It would actually be easier, in some ways, to write a
> Windows version, but there is a problem in writing ANY windows version, and
> that is Non assured latency (even worse than DOS). The problem is, you can
> loose a LOT of clock cycles to other apps, and therefore you don't know how
> fast you program will run, or even if it will pause
>
> That said, the first version I'm doing will continue to be DOS, and then
> I'll do a Windows Version, but that's a ways off. I've been REALLY tied up
> at work, but things are starting to slow down now, so I should have more time.
>

Thanks Charles for clearing that up...I think I will just dust off my
DOS 7.0 and all my books and run it all under DOS. Sounds like it might
be alot simpler.

Don Hughes
Vancouver, BC