Re: It's a definition, was Re: Conversion
Posted by
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
on 2002-06-21 12:18:44 UTC
At 07:09 PM 6/21/2002 -0000, Mariss wrote:
millimeters. That is an exact mathematical definition. Just as the exact
mathematical conversion between degrees F and degrees C is F = 1.8C + 32,
but measuring in either system is subject to the accuracy of the
instrumentation.
Best regards,
Randy
Randy Gordon-Gilmore ,----.___________ ______________ _________________
ProtoTrains // = = === == || == == == = || == == == = == =|
Rio Vista, CA, USA /-O==O------------o==o------------o==o-----------o==o-'
zephyrus@... http://www.rickadee.net/~zephyrus
>Turns out not to be so either.Yes, but we're only concerned with the relationship between inches and
millimeters. That is an exact mathematical definition. Just as the exact
mathematical conversion between degrees F and degrees C is F = 1.8C + 32,
but measuring in either system is subject to the accuracy of the
instrumentation.
Best regards,
Randy
Randy Gordon-Gilmore ,----.___________ ______________ _________________
ProtoTrains // = = === == || == == == = || == == == = == =|
Rio Vista, CA, USA /-O==O------------o==o------------o==o-----------o==o-'
zephyrus@... http://www.rickadee.net/~zephyrus
Discussion Thread
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-06-21 11:32:30 UTC
It's a definition, was Re: Conversion
mariss92705
2002-06-21 12:09:38 UTC
It's a definition, was Re: Conversion
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-06-21 12:18:44 UTC
Re: It's a definition, was Re: Conversion
James Owens
2002-06-21 12:19:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] It's a definition, was Re: Conversion