Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re: Re: re:Re: Interferometer designs for DRO or servo control?
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-10-13 23:49:18 UTC
Elliot Burke wrote:
670 nM L.D.
in a photoplotter, but never tried any interferometer setups with them.
Jon
>Jon,Very interesting! Well, I guess I'm behind the times! I have used a
>Short coherence length of laser diodes was true for the first visible laser
>diodes I measured 5 years ago or so, the 670 nm ones.
>
>When they switched to 650 nm a few years ago (for DVD?) the design was
>changed, and now the coherence length is quite long. There are articles in
>the optics testing literature of people making measurements with several
>meters of optical path difference with these newer (but still cheap!)
>diodes.
>
>I have used them up to about 300 mm path difference with no reduction in
>fringe contrast.
>
>
>
670 nM L.D.
in a photoplotter, but never tried any interferometer setups with them.
Jon
Discussion Thread
michael pettengill
2002-10-12 12:36:32 UTC
Interferometer designs for DRO or servo control?
Jon Elson
2002-10-12 13:02:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interferometer designs for DRO or servo control?
Elliot Burke
2002-10-12 15:41:55 UTC
re:Re: Interferometer designs for DRO or servo control?
Jon Elson
2002-10-12 22:52:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: Interferometer designs for DRO or servo control?
Elliot Burke
2002-10-13 21:33:59 UTC
re: Re: re:Re: Interferometer designs for DRO or servo control?
Jon Elson
2002-10-13 23:49:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re: Re: re:Re: Interferometer designs for DRO or servo control?