Re: microstepping torque
Posted by
hugo_cnc
on 2002-10-22 14:33:41 UTC
Hi Jon,
I use indeed pretty big steppers maximun holding torque is something
like 8.5 Nm, there also hybrid steppers. I don't know the diffenence
between hybrid and normal, but the curve (speed vs torque) of hybrid
steppers are more stretcht out, so they have more torque at high
speed. I have them run at 50.000 Hz, so that 1500 rpm, I use this for
rapid feed only.
All this is, as you mentioned, holding torque. Thanks for your
feedback.
Hugo
steppers --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
I use indeed pretty big steppers maximun holding torque is something
like 8.5 Nm, there also hybrid steppers. I don't know the diffenence
between hybrid and normal, but the curve (speed vs torque) of hybrid
steppers are more stretcht out, so they have more torque at high
speed. I have them run at 50.000 Hz, so that 1500 rpm, I use this for
rapid feed only.
All this is, as you mentioned, holding torque. Thanks for your
feedback.
Hugo
steppers --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
>what
>
> hugo_cnc wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I've a question about microstepping. If I look at the speed vs.
> >torque diagram, the steppers I'm using have a torque of 3 Nm (460
> >0z/in) at 5000 Hz. This in half step mode, if use microsteppers
> >happens with the torque.revolution,
> >With microsteppers I use 5 times more steps for the same
> >so at 5000hz the microsteppersriver is sending 25.000 steps. Thetorque?
> >torque at 25.000 Hz is pretty low.
> >So basicly the questions is how does microstepping inflect the
> >observed 3
> >
> Microstepping should not affect the torque. Have you actually
> Nm at 5000 half-stepsgeneral,
> per second? I would be very suspicious of this measurement. In
> most steppers lose athey
> great deal of their holding torque even at moderate speed. 5000
> half-steps/sec (where half-steps
> give 400 pulses/rev) comes out to 12.5 Rev/sec, or 750 RPM. That is
> going pretty fast for
> large, two-phase steppers. If they really give 3 Nm at this speed,
> must have holding torquethis
> of nearly 10 Nm, I'd guess. (5-phase steppers do much better in
> regard, though.)supposed
>
> I wonder if this "spec" is really a typo, and the meaning was
> to be that you get
> 3 Nm HOLDING torque, and "usable" torque to 5000 half-steps/sec.
>
> Jon
Discussion Thread
hugo_cnc
2002-10-21 14:34:48 UTC
microstepping torque
Jon Elson
2002-10-21 22:09:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] microstepping torque
hugo_cnc
2002-10-22 14:33:41 UTC
Re: microstepping torque