Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO board closer to working but still not
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-10-23 10:49:16 UTC
onecooltoolfool wrote:
motion.
It most certainly will not cause problems in accurately counting the pulses.
Mixing up the pairing of the signals on a differential encoder WILL
cause unreliable
reading, but most of these hobby boards don't accept differential
signals. Differential
encoders have A and A-, B and B- signals. The A- and B- are often shown
with a
"vinculum" or overbar, which I can't do here.
Jon
>I got the board address problem fixed by just installing in anotherReversing A and B is a time-honored method of reversing the sign of the
>computer. There is some kind of input comming in but it is erratic
>and not working properly. I have tried a couple of encoders and the
>result is the same. The numbers flicker and jump but don't
>correspond to any real values.
>
>Does having the A and B channels reversed matter? I didn't think so.
>
>
motion.
It most certainly will not cause problems in accurately counting the pulses.
Mixing up the pairing of the signals on a differential encoder WILL
cause unreliable
reading, but most of these hobby boards don't accept differential
signals. Differential
encoders have A and A-, B and B- signals. The A- and B- are often shown
with a
"vinculum" or overbar, which I can't do here.
Jon
Discussion Thread
onecooltoolfool
2002-10-23 05:09:12 UTC
DRO board closer to working but still not
Tim Goldstein
2002-10-23 10:01:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO board closer to working but still not
Jon Elson
2002-10-23 10:49:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO board closer to working but still not
William Scalione
2002-10-23 15:10:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO board closer to working but still not