Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inductosyn DRO was balls
Posted by
Doug Harrison
on 2002-10-25 12:13:26 UTC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Elson" <elson@...>
>
> I don't think they are very fine grain. Something like 10 waves / inch.
The rest is done by interpolation. A printed circuit board maker that can
handle a 30" x 1" circuit board could probably make a batch of these for a
couple of hundred bucks. I
> might run a quote to find out what my favorite board house can do.
>
The pdf reference you posted described the scales as 10" sections with .1",
.2" or 2mm pitch. The sections are laid end to end, connected in series and
attached to a metal base. Loss of accuracy at the joints is minimized
because the receiver averages the signal over several periods.
Perhaps the shorter segments would be less expensive to produce and easier
to mount.
This looks like a great solution for long router tables!
Doug
Discussion Thread
vrsculptor
2002-10-24 11:05:45 UTC
Balls in tube DRO Resolver to Digital
vrsculptor
2002-10-24 11:05:55 UTC
Balls in tube DRO Resolver to Digital
Jon Elson
2002-10-24 21:45:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Balls in tube DRO Resolver to Digital
Doug Harrison
2002-10-25 08:08:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Balls in tube DRO Resolver to Digital
vrsculptor
2002-10-25 09:09:16 UTC
Inductosyn DRO was balls
Jon Elson
2002-10-25 10:50:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inductosyn DRO was balls
Doug Harrison
2002-10-25 12:13:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inductosyn DRO was balls
Bill Higdon
2002-10-30 19:51:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Inductosyn DRO was balls
Keith Bowers
2002-10-31 07:20:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Inductosyn DRO was balls
JJ
2002-10-31 13:27:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Inductosyn DRO was balls
Keith Bowers
2002-10-31 15:43:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Inductosyn DRO was balls