Re: VFD: sensorless vector vs v/hz models
Posted by
jmkasunich
on 2002-11-11 13:35:19 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "jmkasunich" <jmkasunich@y...> wrote:
in the lab...
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "motovidia" <motovidia@a...> wrote:PS: That's why we sometimes refer to it as "senseless" vector
> > For a full size mill (bp clone), what makes the sensorless vector
> > vfd superior or better than the "standard" volt/hertz types?
> > TIA
> > Femi
>
>
> I've had enough "mysterious" problems that
> were caused by complex controls that I tend to prefer simple
> V/Hz whenever it can deliver adequate performance.
in the lab...
> John Kasunich
Discussion Thread
motovidia
2002-11-11 10:21:28 UTC
VFD: sensorless vector vs v/hz models
jmkasunich
2002-11-11 13:33:13 UTC
Re: VFD: sensorless vector vs v/hz models
jmkasunich
2002-11-11 13:35:19 UTC
Re: VFD: sensorless vector vs v/hz models