Re: Home PCB production (fwd)
Posted by
Ted Robbins
on 2000-02-10 20:33:31 UTC
>Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 17:53:15 -0800 (PST)
>From: Ron Wickersham <rjw@...>
>X-Sender: rjw@tycho-ether
>To: Ted Robins <rtr@...>
>Subject: Re: Home PCB production (fwd)
>
>hi Ted,
>
>this reference to Don Lancaster's site you may want to forward with your
>discussion of pc boards to the DRO list. this appeared on usenet:
>alt.electronics.manufacture.circuitboard
>
>-ron
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>From: "Uni Bummer" <jackrosen_spamnot@...>
>Newsgroups: alt.electronics.manufacture.circuitboard
>Subject: Re: Home PCB production
>Message-ID: <Oevo4.35682$ox5.8867475@...>
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 02:09:02 MST
>
>see Don Lancaster's site.
>
>http://www.tinaja.com
>
>Spend a month there, and ask the
>magic 8 ball again.
>
>Ferric Chloride sucks.
>Toner Transfer sucks.
>
>Get Ammonium Persulphate and similar.
>Buy the dry film and laminate it.
>Use a high output UV point source at 4'
>with a vacuum hold system.
>Anything else (or less) is pointless unless
>you want to settle for junk.
>
>UB
>
>
>"Paul" <paul@...> wrote in message
>news:87q40n$73f$1@......
>> I am looking for a method of producing simple PCBs at home. I have the
>> necessary CAD programmes and the ferric chloride - what I am missing is a
>> simple method of transferring my designs from the PC to the copper. Does
>> anyone have an alternative to the etch resistant pen & tape or the light
>box
>> ?
>>
>> Any pointers would be welcome - or perhaps you offer a low cost PCB
>> prototyping service to UK hobbyists.
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>
>
>-- end of forwarded message --
>
>