CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: PSU math

on 2002-12-14 07:23:37 UTC
Wow Dave,

great explanation.

Very simple and it puts all the pieces in order.

Dave




--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Dave Martindale
<dave.martindale@s...> wrote:
>
> >I thought this way, too, when I first bench-tested my first (only,
so far)
> >bipolar-CHOPPER Gecko-drives (G210). Mariss explained to me why
the MAGIC I
> >observed: I had about 30 Volts, unregulated but filtered
("smoothed" in
> >English-English; We Yanks call that "filtered"), DC feeding two
G210's,
> >those driving two 3+ amp motors, with two 3+ volt windings, each,
i.e., about
> >20 watts per motor. With BOTH motors stepping simultaneously,
meaning that
> >neither was drawing only 1/3 current "at standstill" like the
Gecko drives do
> >after a second or so pause, the DC from the 30 V supply was less
than two
> >amps! Yet, both motors had "full rated torque". Mariss pointed
out that the
> >supply was supplying WATTS, as the chopper-drive still puts-out
about 30
> >volts with this supply to the motor-windings, but "chopped", to
average the
> >current down to the 3+ amps rating.
>
> This is all true, but there's a catch.
>
> The reason it works is the way the chopped waveform from the driver
> interacts with the inductance of the motor. To keep the example
simple,
> suppose we have a 30 V supply and a motor rated 3 A at 3 V. The
drive will
> automatically adjust its pulse width to keep 3 A (average) flowing
in each
> winding. In this example, this will happen with a driver duty
cycle of 10%.
> For 10% of the time, the motor inductance "sees" 27 V applied
across it (30
> V supply minus 3 V resistive loss in the winding), and the current
increases
> at some rate that depends on inductance. For the other 90% of the
time, the
> inductance sees -3 V, and the current decreases. The rate of
decrease is
> only 1/9 as fast as the increase, but it happens for 9 times as
long. The
> net effect is that the average current remains 3 A, but the
instantaneous
> current goes above and below that in a sawtooth waveform.
>
> So the power supply does supply 3 A of current, but only 10% of the
time,
> for an average current of 0.3 A, and a power of 9 W. During that
10% on
> time, the voltage stuffs energy into the inductor in the circuit
(which
> happens to be the motor winding). The other 90% of the time, the
current in
> the winding is actually supplied by the stored energy in the
magnetic field.
> The winding has an average current of 3 A, and an average voltage
of 3 V,
> so it's drawing 9 W. Thus, we've "transformed" 9W from the power
supply
> into 9 W in the motor, without using a transformer, even though the
power
> supply is running at 30 V and the motor at 3 V. This is very
unlike a
> system using dropping resistors, where the supply would have to
provide 3A
> continuous at 30 V (90 W) and the resistors would have to dissipate
most of
> that. (There are some losses in a chopper system - switching
losses in
> transistors, core losses in the motor).
>
> The "catch" is that the analysis above only applies when the motor
is
> stationary. Once you start turning the motor, you get back EMF
developed in
> the windings. This requires more voltage across the windings to
maintain
> the same current, which makes the PWM driver increase its "on"
time. And
> that draws more average current from the power supply. At some
sufficiently
> high RPM, the motor will need 30 V across it, the driver will
be "on" all
> the time, and the power supply will have to supply 3 A per
winding. That's
> at the maximum full-torque speed. You can run the motor even
faster, but
> now the current drops below 3 A and the torque goes down.
>
> Thus, with a PWM drive, the current needed from the PSU is low at
zero
> speed, rises to PSU voltage times motor current at a particular
speed, and
> then falls above that speed. In comparison, a resistor-type drive
demands
> the maximum power when the motor is stationary, and current (and
torque)
> drops with increase in speed.
>
> The peak power out of the PSU depends on how fast you will run the
> motors, and how many you will have running at once. It also
depends on how
> long you'll maintain those peaks - a transformer can withstand a
lot of
> overload for a short period, but the diode bridge in the power
supply may
> have less "headroom".
>
> Dave

Discussion Thread

Dave Martindale 2002-12-13 19:27:52 UTC PSU math turbulatordude <davemucha@j... 2002-12-14 07:23:37 UTC Re: PSU math