Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
Posted by
A. G. Eckstein
on 2000-03-06 17:37:31 UTC
At 06:40 PM 03/05/2000 -0000, you wrote:
shaftby pressing under the aluminum boss and used the screw heads for the
plate as a fulcrum. They are a press fit.
Now that I am trying to do some other work, am building a small press out
of some flat stock and some screws so I won't have to worry about the
screwdrivers slipping (and that has happened)
I got the retaining ring off without
Art
A. G. Eckstein
axtein@...
>From: "Terry May" <tmay@...>Terry, I just used to big screwdrivers and pryed the encoders off the
>
>Art,
> Here I am again asking questions... How did you get the encoder
>wheel off of the motor shaft?
shaftby pressing under the aluminum boss and used the screw heads for the
plate as a fulcrum. They are a press fit.
Now that I am trying to do some other work, am building a small press out
of some flat stock and some screws so I won't have to worry about the
screwdrivers slipping (and that has happened)
I got the retaining ring off without
>destroying the disc but can't seem to get the disc off the shaft. ItSounds good to me, good luck.
>appears to be bonded to the aluminum disk underneath it and that acts
>like it is a press fit on the shaft. I hesitate to apply too much
>force trying to pry it off but am looking for clues.
> On the other hand I have a bunch of small plastic pulleys with ball
>bearing centers that came out of the plotter that yielded the cable I
>plan to use. Since they have an ID enough larger than 5mm that I
>think I can bush them to fit the encoder shafts, I plan to use those
>to run the cable over, seems like they would be less likely to have
>any slippage since HP designed them to be used with the cable. Does
>this sound reasonable to anyone, just looking for ideas.
Art
A. G. Eckstein
axtein@...
Discussion Thread
Terry May
2000-02-28 15:56:43 UTC
RE: DRO UPDATE
A. G. Eckstein
2000-02-28 16:31:06 UTC
Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
Terry May
2000-03-04 09:08:28 UTC
Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
A. G. Eckstein
2000-03-04 09:48:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
Terry May
2000-03-04 13:50:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
Ward M.
2000-03-04 13:55:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
Dan Mauch
2000-03-04 16:03:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
A. G. Eckstein
2000-03-04 19:56:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
Terry May
2000-03-05 10:41:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
A. G. Eckstein
2000-03-06 17:37:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
Terry May
2000-03-07 03:37:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
Terry May
2000-03-07 03:40:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
A. G. Eckstein
2000-03-10 18:37:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
wanliker@a...
2000-03-10 19:01:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
Terry May
2000-03-12 13:00:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
Ros
2000-03-12 19:37:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RE: DRO UPDATE
A. G. Eckstein
2000-03-25 16:57:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] I'm back (Kind of)