Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] encoders and table position
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-06-05 22:06:38 UTC
Weyland wrote:
resolution of the scales pretty easily, but that might be too coarse.
As long as they provide some sort of quadrature signal, it should be
relatively simple to interface them.
encoder on that screw will be no better.
with linear motion of the machine. These have been discussed in great
detail in past threads.
Jon
>Okay, having looked into it a bit more, it doesn't look like the linearWhy won't they work? Are they analog scales? You can get the basic
>scales I have are going to work with the Kaluga/Mauch DRO board after all.
>
>
resolution of the scales pretty easily, but that might be too coarse.
As long as they provide some sort of quadrature signal, it should be
relatively simple to interface them.
>My reservation against using the itty-bitty QEDS units I haveYes, if your screw is of low quality, then anything read out by an
>is that they measure screw movement and not table position.
>
>
encoder on that screw will be no better.
>Has anyone come across a *relatively* inexpensive solution toThere are some schemes for using rollers or wires to turn shaft encoders
>constructing linear encoders for use with the K&M board & EMC?
>
>
with linear motion of the machine. These have been discussed in great
detail in past threads.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Weyland
2003-06-05 19:03:39 UTC
encoders and table position
Jon Elson
2003-06-05 22:06:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] encoders and table position
Weyland
2003-06-05 22:25:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] encoders and table position
Jon Elson
2003-06-05 22:48:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] encoders and table position
Weyland
2003-06-05 23:21:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] encoders and table position