CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Which to trust, home-built DROs or hash marks?

Posted by Damon
on 2003-08-04 16:47:26 UTC
Did you measure the end mill? I have a boatload of 1/2" EMs
that measure 0.450 - 0.480.

Also when you manually manipulated the knobs, did you account
for backlash ? like approaching both locations from the same side?,
and clamp the gib of the non-used axis?

Just trying to rule out the easy stuff.
-Damon

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "John A. McFadden"
<mcfadden@c...> wrote:
> I recently completed fabricating and installing the Y axis of my
home-built
> DRO (using a 25 cycle per mm linear strip from Encodertech.com,
which gives
> a DRO resolution of 0.00039xxxxxx inches per jump of the encoder
after
> quadrature) using Art Eckstein's DRO program and interface plans (I
used
> linear strips instead of rotary disks because I dont have a lathe to
turn
> the bushings).
> Now that I have the Y axis complete, there comes the question of
> calibration. My mill is an Enco 16 3/8" Mill/Drill, and I found
that when I
> milled two flats onto a billet of aluminum such that the flats would
be
> 1.500" apart (using the hash marks on the mill's Y handle to
determine size)
> using a 1/2" endmill that the following measurements resulted:
> The Mill/Drill's hash marks read out 2.000" between centers (so the
flats
> should have been 1.500" apart)
> My digital calipers (cheap chinese) said its 1.514" between the
flats
> My standard calipers (not dial) said its 1.515" between the flats
> and my digital readouts (I calculated the incremental value using
the 25
> cycles per millimeter and calculated it out to be the 0.00039xxxxxx
number
> which I then plugged directly into the program, rather than using a
scale
> and needle for the calibration because I just ordered the scale on
Thursday
> and it hasnt shown up yet) said that the endmill moved 2.0164"
(saying that
> flats were 1.5164" apart).
>
> Now the question comes up, what to trust? Should I just accept the
1% error
> in the hashmarks on the mill and only use the DROs (the X and Z axis
parts
> should be arriving on Thursday)? Or should I investigate further to
find out
> if there's any other error in the system?
>
> Thanks,
> John McFadden

Discussion Thread

John A. McFadden 2003-08-04 16:28:31 UTC Which to trust, home-built DROs or hash marks? Damon 2003-08-04 16:47:26 UTC Re: Which to trust, home-built DROs or hash marks? John A. McFadden 2003-08-04 19:02:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Which to trust, home-built DROs or hash marks? Dan Mauch 2003-08-04 20:15:25 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Which to trust, home-built DROs or hash marks? Jon Elson 2003-08-04 22:46:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Which to trust, home-built DROs or hash marks? John A. McFadden 2003-08-05 03:16:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Which to trust, home-built DROs or hash marks? John A. McFadden 2003-08-05 03:16:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Which to trust, home-built DROs or hash marks? Peter L. Peres 2003-08-06 19:42:34 UTC [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Which to trust, home-built DROs or hash marks? Jon Elson 2003-08-06 21:22:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Which to trust, home-built DROs or hash marks? Don Rogers 2003-08-06 22:25:21 UTC Re:Which to trust, home-built DROs or hash marks? Peter L. Peres 2003-08-08 06:16:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Which to trust, home-built DROs or hash marks? John A. McFadden 2003-08-08 07:53:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Which to trust, home-built DROs or hash marks? Jon Elson 2003-08-08 10:28:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Which to trust, home-built DROs or hash marks?