RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoders / Slides
Posted by
John Craddock
on 2003-12-03 23:23:03 UTC
-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Elson [mailto:elson@...]
Sent: 04 December 2003 16:52
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoders / Slides
But, it does. 10 uM resolution is .0004", a much larger unit. It is an old
rule of thumb that the encoder should have 10 X the resolution of the
display
Doesn't quadrature give you about 0.001" at worst maybe 5 tenths with care even with the 10* rule of thumb?
John C
From: Jon Elson [mailto:elson@...]
Sent: 04 December 2003 16:52
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoders / Slides
But, it does. 10 uM resolution is .0004", a much larger unit. It is an old
rule of thumb that the encoder should have 10 X the resolution of the
display
Doesn't quadrature give you about 0.001" at worst maybe 5 tenths with care even with the 10* rule of thumb?
John C
Discussion Thread
Dave Fisher
2003-12-03 08:00:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoders / Slides
Kim Lux
2003-12-03 08:10:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoders / Slides
Jon Elson
2003-12-03 10:33:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoders / Slides
Jerry Kimberlin
2003-12-03 10:47:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoders / Slides
Dave Fisher
2003-12-03 10:50:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoders / Slides
Jon Elson
2003-12-03 22:54:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoders / Slides
John Craddock
2003-12-03 23:23:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoders / Slides