Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USB DRO
Posted by
Eric Keller
on 2000-04-06 11:20:12 UTC
Jon Elson wrote:
. I think 8 axes plus digital control is
reasonable with respect
to bandwidth of the USB, but I have no idea about latency.
Jon
I think that the whole idea of USB is dependent on distributed intelligent
devices really, which is the way of the future for most things.
However, if like most of us you want to use the pc as the _device_,
usb is not the way to go.
eric
. I think 8 axes plus digital control is
reasonable with respect
to bandwidth of the USB, but I have no idea about latency.
Jon
I think that the whole idea of USB is dependent on distributed intelligent
devices really, which is the way of the future for most things.
However, if like most of us you want to use the pc as the _device_,
usb is not the way to go.
eric
Discussion Thread
james owens
2000-04-05 10:12:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USB DRO
James Cullins
2000-04-05 16:35:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USB DRO
Tim Goldstein
2000-04-05 20:48:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USB DRO
Eric Keller
2000-04-06 11:20:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USB DRO
james owens
2000-04-06 12:04:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USB DRO
Bruce Hassell
2000-04-06 12:37:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USB DRO