Re: RotoBot hexapod
Posted by
Graham Stabler
on 2003-12-14 13:04:17 UTC
> Does anyone have any ideas on how to implement this approach, in aI do think that this and the hexaglide/triaglide solutions are more
>home built machine? I mean, I could probably go to a machine shop
>and have parts made, but that's just throwing money at it...I'm
>thinking in terms of the way we build other small routers, truly >
>hacking a solution. And, would any existing programs be able to
>control it?
realistic for the amateur. I have to say that although the
rotational method looks elegant I can't think of a way of doing it on
a real budget. You really want a rack around the circumference and a
motor with pinion on each of the rotating arms. Fairly normal
bearings in the middle and some sort of roller system to stop each of
the arms from flexing upwards or downwards.
The hard part would seem to be the ring shaped rack. Perhaps a
timing belt could be glued into the inside of a ring. That is
perhaps a little too much of a botch. Either that or you need a huge
planetary gearbox to take to pieces.
If it counts for anything, I'm up for it.
If the machine is there, the software will follow.
Graham
Discussion Thread
Chuck Knight
2003-12-13 20:30:29 UTC
RotoBot hexapod
Graham Stabler
2003-12-14 13:04:17 UTC
Re: RotoBot hexapod
Graham Stabler
2003-12-14 13:06:04 UTC
Re: RotoBot hexapod
Graham Stabler
2003-12-14 13:35:35 UTC
Re: RotoBot hexapod
John Craddock
2003-12-14 14:22:04 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RotoBot hexapod
Graham Stabler
2003-12-14 14:56:31 UTC
Re: RotoBot hexapod
Raymond Gage
2003-12-14 17:39:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RotoBot hexapod
Chuck Knight
2003-12-14 19:41:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RotoBot hexapod
wanliker@a...
2003-12-14 19:48:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RotoBot hexapod
Graham Stabler
2003-12-15 02:09:07 UTC
Re: RotoBot hexapod
Graham Stabler
2003-12-15 14:34:56 UTC
Re: RotoBot hexapod - joints