Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Losing steps...
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2004-07-13 08:30:11 UTC
>-----Original Message-----One other comment: If you are really quibbling over 0.0003" change, you may
>From: Patrick [mailto:alleven@...]
>Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 8:28 PM
>To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] <sigh> Losing steps...
>
>I've recently discovered my machine is losing steps, as steppers do, and so
>I'm trying to figure out if some (small) amount of missed steps is "normal."
>The resolution on my machine is quite small (.000098"), and I'm wondering if
>it's just too much to ask to expect it not to lose any steps at all. I can
>usually re-home the machine after a fairly long program and get less than
>.0003" "homing error", (measured with the homing switches, which are
>purported to be repeatable to .000039" when new). I'm really not getting
>wrapped around the axle with meaninglessly small numbers, but I would like
>to know if a properly working stepper system can be expected to miss no
>steps? At what point do I declare a problem? 3 missed steps or 10 missed
>steps?
>
>
be experiencing thermal expansion of the entire machine, or just the
leadscrew,
during the run of the program. The "big CNC" guys have warm-up programs
that run the axes back and forth for a half-hour or so to bring them up to
more stable temperatures before aligning the workpieces and beginning to
cut metal.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Patrick
2004-07-12 20:52:17 UTC
Losing steps...
notoneleft
2004-07-13 07:02:17 UTC
Re: Losing steps...
Joe Hlebasko
2004-07-13 07:56:46 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Losing steps...
Jon Elson
2004-07-13 08:27:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Losing steps...
Jon Elson
2004-07-13 08:30:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Losing steps...
Patrick
2004-07-15 16:22:48 UTC
Re: Losing steps...
Jon Elson
2004-07-16 08:55:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Losing steps...