Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NAMES 2000 PICS
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-05-02 14:18:28 UTC
Bert Eding wrote:
control. There is no way to tilt the platform by way of the
RS-274 commands. In other words, it accomplishes only
3 degrees of freedom in the commands, and that is the
cartesian coordinates. The guys at NIST are working on
generalizing the interpreter to accomodate up to 6 degrees
of freedom. When this is done, it will not only generalize
movement of a Stewart platform (hexapod) but also allow
fully general movement of 4-6 axis machines, I am told.
I am looking forward to this eagerly, as I have wanted to put
a dividing head on my mill.
Jon
> Very interresting!The hexapod version of EMC offers very limited 6-axis
>
> Do you have a special version of EMC,
> how do You control 6 axes,
> I am very interested.
>
> Is there a 6 axis trajectory planner in this EMC version,
> if so I woul like to have it.
control. There is no way to tilt the platform by way of the
RS-274 commands. In other words, it accomplishes only
3 degrees of freedom in the commands, and that is the
cartesian coordinates. The guys at NIST are working on
generalizing the interpreter to accomodate up to 6 degrees
of freedom. When this is done, it will not only generalize
movement of a Stewart platform (hexapod) but also allow
fully general movement of 4-6 axis machines, I am told.
I am looking forward to this eagerly, as I have wanted to put
a dividing head on my mill.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Greg Nuspel
2000-05-02 03:34:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NAMES 2000 PICS
Reid
2000-05-02 11:54:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NAMES 2000 PICS
Bert Eding
2000-05-02 12:09:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NAMES 2000 PICS
Jon Elson
2000-05-02 14:18:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NAMES 2000 PICS
ptengin@a...
2000-05-02 21:48:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NAMES 2000 PICS
bfp
2000-05-02 22:40:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NAMES 2000 PICS