Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: CPNC
Posted by
Jon Anderson
on 2000-05-05 11:18:48 UTC
Jon Elson wrote:
were doing, the Newall system was still faster, requiring fewer inputs.
The one thing I learned from this is, no matter how impressive the demo,
(which are always well tuned routines) always give the salesman a
real-world sample that is representative of your average work.
Jon
> My guess is the Newall guy WAS either a machinist or machinePretty close, I'd say. Still, even after the AcuRite guys knew what they
> programmer, while the AcuRite guys (Two of them, no less!) were
> salesmen with little real understanding of what they were doing.
were doing, the Newall system was still faster, requiring fewer inputs.
The one thing I learned from this is, no matter how impressive the demo,
(which are always well tuned routines) always give the salesman a
real-world sample that is representative of your average work.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
2000-05-04 15:09:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: CPNC
Jon Elson
2000-05-04 22:07:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: CPNC
Tim Barnard
2000-05-04 23:00:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: CPNC
Jon Anderson
2000-05-05 06:52:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: CPNC
Tim Barnard
2000-05-05 08:06:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: CPNC
Jon Anderson
2000-05-05 08:37:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: CPNC
Jon Anderson
2000-05-05 08:44:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: CPNC
Jon Elson
2000-05-05 10:24:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: CPNC
Jon Anderson
2000-05-05 11:18:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: CPNC