Re: Machine geometry
Posted by
Robert Campbell
on 1999-06-12 19:37:10 UTC
Geoff ,
The size of the table depends on what you plan to make. I have a 4' by 4'
moving gantry system which has some play in it. I am currently building a
2' by 2' fixed bridge cnc router that should be very ridged. I cut a lot of
Corian and wood parts.
Bob Campbell
The size of the table depends on what you plan to make. I have a 4' by 4'
moving gantry system which has some play in it. I am currently building a
2' by 2' fixed bridge cnc router that should be very ridged. I cut a lot of
Corian and wood parts.
Bob Campbell
----- Original Message -----
From: Geoff Roehm <groehm@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@onelist.com>
Sent: Monday, June 07, 1999 5:44 AM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Machine geometry
> From: groehm@... (Geoff Roehm)
>
> Per the recent request for lurkers to de-lurk:
>
> I recently received some linear components from Bill Scalione, and now
> have to decide what kind of machine to build with them. I have two sets
> of 1" dia. rails, 54" and 66" long. Also two tables, nominally 22"
> square with two open bearings at each corner along one edge, and one
> open bearing centered along the opposite edge. These tables weigh about
> 30 lbs apiece.
>
> My question is what geometry will be best for a (mostly) wood router? I
> like the greater working envelope that a moving-Y gantry system would
> provide, but this requires a longer leadscrew and probably heavier
> motor. The moving-X table system, while easier to build, and probably
> more accurate, provides only half the travel.
>
> Any suggestions appreciated.
>
> Geoff Roehm
> http://personalweb.edge.net/~groehm/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Where do some of the Internet's largest email lists reside?
> http://www.onelist.com
> At ONElist - the most scalable and reliable service on the Internet.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@..., an unmodulated list for the
discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.
>
Discussion Thread
groehm@x...
1999-06-07 03:44:58 UTC
Machine geometry
Robert Campbell
1999-06-12 19:37:10 UTC
Re: Machine geometry
garfield@x...
1999-06-12 19:58:28 UTC
Re: Machine geometry
Robert Campbell
1999-06-13 07:55:01 UTC
Re: Machine geometry
garfield@x...
1999-06-13 09:35:32 UTC
Re: Machine geometry