Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Measuring backlash with a ohm meter
Posted by
R Rogers
on 2004-10-23 14:39:45 UTC
Pete,
I guess I should do a little more reading and a little less thinking..lol. I re-read his post and now I see what he meant. Thats another version of an electronic edge-finder of sorts. I agree, that wouldnt work for most mills. I'm surprised that it does read different resistance.
Ron
vavaroutsos <pete@...> wrote:
Ron, I may have mis-understood what Chuck was saying, but I think he
is measuring the electrical resistance from the work to the spindle,
not the resistance to movement on the axis. This would require that
the work be electrically isolated from the mill or the probe be
electrically isolated. Things may have worked ok in Chucks case due
to the construcion of the mill not providing much electrical
conductivity from the spindle to the table, but I don't think this is
a valid assumption for all mills.
~petev
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, R Rogers
wrote:
minute crash. Contacting a surface to the point the drive begins to
struggle would not be touching off on an edge. Due to deflection. I'm
not ruling out that this would be accurate. It would require testing
involving the method you perscribed versus a conventional edge
finder. If the results parallel that would be a great edge-finding
technique. Design into a machine control software to enter a setup
screen that when resistance is sensed upon a drive it would
automatically zero that axis, spindle rotating as this is more
accurate. Would need to be able to distinguish between touching and
fast jog resistance measured. Could even have a compensation preset
for the radius of the stylus. None for Z obviuosly. Possibly an
extremely stiff die spring in the shank of the edge finder to prevent
damage on over-travel. This would be alot faster than present
it if you have trouble.
there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators]
URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner
Yahoo! Groups Links
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I guess I should do a little more reading and a little less thinking..lol. I re-read his post and now I see what he meant. Thats another version of an electronic edge-finder of sorts. I agree, that wouldnt work for most mills. I'm surprised that it does read different resistance.
Ron
vavaroutsos <pete@...> wrote:
Ron, I may have mis-understood what Chuck was saying, but I think he
is measuring the electrical resistance from the work to the spindle,
not the resistance to movement on the axis. This would require that
the work be electrically isolated from the mill or the probe be
electrically isolated. Things may have worked ok in Chucks case due
to the construcion of the mill not providing much electrical
conductivity from the spindle to the table, but I don't think this is
a valid assumption for all mills.
~petev
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, R Rogers
wrote:
> Interesting concept. However what may seem absolute is often not.Measuring resistance upon contact is measuring the effects of a slow
minute crash. Contacting a surface to the point the drive begins to
struggle would not be touching off on an edge. Due to deflection. I'm
not ruling out that this would be accurate. It would require testing
involving the method you perscribed versus a conventional edge
finder. If the results parallel that would be a great edge-finding
technique. Design into a machine control software to enter a setup
screen that when resistance is sensed upon a drive it would
automatically zero that axis, spindle rotating as this is more
accurate. Would need to be able to distinguish between touching and
fast jog resistance measured. Could even have a compensation preset
for the radius of the stylus. None for Z obviuosly. Possibly an
extremely stiff die spring in the shank of the edge finder to prevent
damage on over-travel. This would be alot faster than present
> method. Sometimes when I'm in a hurry I just use the end-mill forthe cut as an edge finder, step-jog to touch and then add the radius.
>beat. It's not something that is measured all the time.
> For measuring backlash, a good dial indicator is pretty tough to
>useful
> Ron
>
>
> Chuck Rice wrote:
>
>
>
> I just tried something and it seemed to work well, but since I am a
> newbie, I wonted to pass it by the list to see if it might be
> to others.Ohm
>
> I wanted to measure the backlash on my Sherline, so I attached an
> Meter to my mill. One terminal to the bed, and the other to thetill
> spindle. It read a resistance of about 2k ohm. Then I lowered Z
> a bit touched the surface of the milling plate and the resistanceto
> went to zero. Then zeroed Z and micro-stepped back up till the
> resistance went back to 2k ohm. Z showed .0012. To test, I lowered
> zero again and as Z hit zero, the resistance went back down.the
>
> Using this information, it seems that you could devise an
> edge-finding routine for any metallic object that would position
> bit exactly in the X, Y, and Z planes with respect to the object totimg@k...
> be milled.
>
> Has this been tried before? -Chuck-
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@a...,
> Moderator: pentam@c... indigo_red@q... davemucha@j... [Moderators]aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.htmla sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be
there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING
> billAddresses:
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators]
URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner
Yahoo! Groups Links
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
ssm_81_2000
2004-10-22 23:22:37 UTC
Information for CAD/AM Integration
Chuck Rice
2004-10-23 09:47:40 UTC
Measuring backlash with a ohm meter
R Rogers
2004-10-23 11:55:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Measuring backlash with a ohm meter
vavaroutsos
2004-10-23 12:25:32 UTC
Re: Measuring backlash with a ohm meter
R Rogers
2004-10-23 14:39:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Measuring backlash with a ohm meter
Gregory Kamysz
2004-10-23 14:54:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Measuring backlash with a ohm meter
R Rogers
2004-10-23 15:30:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] was Measuring backlash now desktop mill questions
Chuck Rice
2004-10-23 20:00:53 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Measuring backlash with a ohm meter
satchid
2004-10-23 20:01:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Measuring backlash with a ohm meter
Stephen Wille Padnos
2004-10-23 21:27:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Measuring backlash with a ohm meter