Re: NEMA 34 to NEMA 42
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2005-05-03 10:32:49 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
shaft extended into the old hole. Will there be enough shaft left to
hold the pulley in the proper place ? or will the shaft need to be
extended ?
Dave
> Michael Larson wrote:just
>
> >I just got a Wells-Index CNC 700 and I'm looking into converting it to
> >servos.
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7511611969&rd=1&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&rd=1
> >That's the ebay listing of some NEMA-34 frame servos that would be
> >about perfect. I know I could go cheaper by modifying surplustreadmill
> >motors or by keeping a watchful eye on ebay, but these look likethey're
> >more or less turn-key (a huge plus). Anything I should know aboutthem?
> >steppers in
> >The problem is that the Wells machine is coming with NEMA-42
> >place. What's involved in adapting the 34 frame motors to the 42hole
> >mount? I looked up the spec sheets on the two, there are different
> >patterns (2.875" square, 34; 3.5" square, 42) and the shaft diameterseasy.
> >are different (.5" vs .625").
> >
> >
> If you have a lathe, making adaptor plates for the motors should be
> Is the Wells-Index a direct drive or belt drive? If belt, then justget
> a newalso be
> motor pulley with the right bore. If direct drive, the best way is to
> buy a new
> coupling that can be bored out to fit the two shafts. You might
> able toMy concern would be that the new plate would reduce the distance the
> turn a sleeve for the motor shaft.
>
> >
> >
> Jon
shaft extended into the old hole. Will there be enough shaft left to
hold the pulley in the proper place ? or will the shaft need to be
extended ?
Dave
Discussion Thread
Michael Larson
2005-05-03 06:40:10 UTC
NEMA 34 to NEMA 42
Jon Elson
2005-05-03 09:13:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NEMA 34 to NEMA 42
turbulatordude
2005-05-03 10:32:49 UTC
Re: NEMA 34 to NEMA 42
Jon Elson
2005-05-03 18:01:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEMA 34 to NEMA 42