Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Calculating mechanical forces
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2005-08-02 09:45:03 UTC
cnc002@... wrote:
of 190 RPM.
So, that is 100 times slower, so the forces would be 100 times HIGER,
per HP.
causes
much more friction between the tool, the chips and the workpiece than
when cutting
metal. That ends up as torque on the workpiece, rather than linear
force against the
face of the work. The round ways can probably handle torque better than
linear
force.
>He was talking about flycutting steel, and I calculated a spindle speed
>
>In a message dated 8/1/2005 11:05:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>elson@... writes:
>
>Think your round ways and linear bearings can keep the
>machine within it's tolerances with 332 Lbs of force? Well, maybe you
>have a
>smaller motor.
>
>Jon
>
>
>
>Jon:
>
>For years we ran round Thompson type bearings and ways on our CNC routers
>with 12 to 15 Horsepower motors, turning 20,000 rpm and cutting thru wood,
>
of 190 RPM.
So, that is 100 times slower, so the forces would be 100 times HIGER,
per HP.
>Slower cutting speed means GREATER cutting forces. I also suspect wood
>particle board, fiberboard etc. at speeds up to 400 inches per minute. We held
>+/- 0.001" tolerance with no problems on materials where you could measure
>that close. I think round bearings and ways would work just fine with a very
>small motor like most mills run. Plus, the cutting speeds are also slow.
>
>
causes
much more friction between the tool, the chips and the workpiece than
when cutting
metal. That ends up as torque on the workpiece, rather than linear
force against the
face of the work. The round ways can probably handle torque better than
linear
force.
>Jon
>
Discussion Thread
John Johnson
2005-08-01 16:26:44 UTC
Calculating mechanical forces
cnc002@a...
2005-08-01 16:53:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Calculating mechanical forces
John Johnson
2005-08-01 17:28:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Calculating mechanical forces
Max
2005-08-01 18:32:22 UTC
Accuracy expectations of a converted mill/drill
Jon Elson
2005-08-01 20:03:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Calculating mechanical forces
Paul Kelly
2005-08-01 20:56:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Accuracy expectations of a converted mill/drill
cnc002@a...
2005-08-01 21:02:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Calculating mechanical forces
Doug M
2005-08-02 06:24:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Calculating mechanical forces
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-08-02 06:28:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Calculating mechanical forces
John Johnson
2005-08-02 06:36:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Calculating mechanical forces
cnc002@a...
2005-08-02 09:21:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Calculating mechanical forces
cnc002@a...
2005-08-02 09:23:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Calculating mechanical forces
Jon Elson
2005-08-02 09:45:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Calculating mechanical forces
cnc002@a...
2005-08-02 10:40:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Calculating mechanical forces
ringleboy26
2005-08-02 15:12:25 UTC
Re: Calculating mechanical forces
fhugoameal@s...
2005-08-08 09:58:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Calculating mechanical forces
John Johnson
2005-08-08 16:45:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Calculating mechanical forces