CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: LCDs and UV

on 2007-01-03 16:05:20 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@...> wrote:
>
> Also, if you can keep it cool, the DLP can handle a
> LOT of
> light -- like a 1000 W Xenon arc lamp focussed on a thumbnail. The
> trick is the
> DLP shines the mirror spots on the target, or on a black beam dump.
>The LCD absorbs the light not wanted. Turn the "screen" black, and
it >has to absorb the entire 1000 W in the polarizers! Poof!

The question becomes how much power does the hardening of the resin
require? Assuming the very near UV resin was used as per the paper
(460nm). A wide field system has the advantage over a scanning on of
speed so if it requires greater exposure times because of lower power
it might not be so bad.

DLPs are certaily nice but I had a feeling they were a tad expensive
to play with. Anyone any ideas?

Also note that the system linked to is inverted, that means no
complicated fluid leveling systems are required.

Graham

Discussion Thread

Graham Stabler 2007-01-03 07:12:39 UTC LCDs and UV Graham Stabler 2007-01-03 08:00:16 UTC Re: LCDs and UV Graham Stabler 2007-01-03 08:08:04 UTC Re: LCDs and UV Jon Elson 2007-01-03 10:50:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LCDs and UV Graham Stabler 2007-01-03 16:00:27 UTC Re: LCDs and UV Graham Stabler 2007-01-03 16:05:20 UTC Re: LCDs and UV Jon Elson 2007-01-03 20:17:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LCDs and UV Sebastien Bailard 2007-01-03 20:17:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LCDs and UV Graham Stabler 2007-01-04 03:17:40 UTC Re: LCDs and UV laserted007 2007-01-04 05:49:20 UTC Re: LCDs and UV Graham Stabler 2007-01-04 06:09:37 UTC Re: LCDs and UV William Carr 2007-01-05 02:00:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LCDs and UV gsi11135 2007-01-05 14:45:12 UTC Re: LCDs and UV