RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor position control
Posted by
Mark Vaughan
on 2007-06-19 09:12:50 UTC
Thanks David
Knew it was something like that. Hence something like
Thanks for correction.
Dr. Mark Vaughan Ph'D. B.Eng. M0VAU
Managing Director
Vaughan Industries Ltd, reg in UK no 2561068
Water Care Technology Ltd, reg in UK no 4129351
Addr Unit3, Sydney House, Blackwater, Truro, Cornwall, TR4 8HH, UK.
Phone/Fax 44 1872 561288
RSGB DRM111(Cornwall)
_____
From: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David G. LeVine
Sent: 19 June 2007 16:35
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor position control
in a variety of step sizes with 0.9, 1.8 and 7.5
degree steps (and multiples) being most
common. The 1.8º 200 PPR (Pulse Per Revolution)
variant is most common in hobby systems.
There are techniques to reduce resonance effects
other than microstepping, harmonic dampeners
(either a rubber mounted mass or a viscous
coupled mass connected to the motor shaft) is one good example.
David G. LeVine
Nashua, NH 03060
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Knew it was something like that. Hence something like
Thanks for correction.
Dr. Mark Vaughan Ph'D. B.Eng. M0VAU
Managing Director
Vaughan Industries Ltd, reg in UK no 2561068
Water Care Technology Ltd, reg in UK no 4129351
Addr Unit3, Sydney House, Blackwater, Truro, Cornwall, TR4 8HH, UK.
Phone/Fax 44 1872 561288
RSGB DRM111(Cornwall)
_____
From: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David G. LeVine
Sent: 19 June 2007 16:35
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor position control
>A step is normally something like 1.7 degrees,Just as a technical correction, the steppers come
>but depending on the controller they can be made
>to microstep, i.e. have steps within this 1.7
>degree angle, but they will losse the micro
>position is power is lost, and if the load or
>acceleration are too hi they can miss complete
>steps. Normally they work blind, so you feed
>steps to them and hope they don't loose any,
>there is not normally an encoder to feedback any
>error. They also have issues of resonance at some frequencies of operation.
in a variety of step sizes with 0.9, 1.8 and 7.5
degree steps (and multiples) being most
common. The 1.8º 200 PPR (Pulse Per Revolution)
variant is most common in hobby systems.
There are techniques to reduce resonance effects
other than microstepping, harmonic dampeners
(either a rubber mounted mass or a viscous
coupled mass connected to the motor shaft) is one good example.
David G. LeVine
Nashua, NH 03060
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
maxnc15
2007-06-18 19:58:22 UTC
Ordinary AC motors & position control
Mark Vaughan
2007-06-19 03:16:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Ordinary AC motors & position control
Graham Stabler
2007-06-19 05:49:54 UTC
Re: Ordinary AC motors & position control
David G. LeVine
2007-06-19 08:30:16 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor position control
David G. LeVine
2007-06-19 08:37:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Ordinary AC motors & position control
Mark Vaughan
2007-06-19 09:12:50 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor position control
Jon Elson
2007-06-19 09:41:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Ordinary AC motors & position control
Harko Schwartz
2007-06-19 09:52:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Ordinary AC motors & position control
maxnc15
2007-06-19 10:00:43 UTC
Re: Ordinary AC motors & position control
maxnc15
2007-06-19 10:14:16 UTC
Re: Ordinary AC motors & position control
Graham Stabler
2007-06-19 14:03:46 UTC
Re: Ordinary AC motors & position control
Ed
2007-06-19 14:37:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Ordinary AC motors & position control