Re: older encoders safe to use?
Posted by
scyvt
on 2007-09-21 17:01:31 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Muse" <mtebob1@...> wrote:
Ah, that's why some older, but not much older, encoders have "LED" in their part number - to
distinguish them from ones with incandescant light sources. More recently the "LED" has
been dropped, as now being taken for granted.
Thank you, respondents. I now feel more comfortable bidding on older, and therefore
affordable, industrial encoders. It seems reasonable to assume that if they function to begin
with, odds are good that they will continue to do so.
Steve Clay-Young
> The much older ones that use a small light bulb with a filament instead of an LED arewhere the problems are. >
Ah, that's why some older, but not much older, encoders have "LED" in their part number - to
distinguish them from ones with incandescant light sources. More recently the "LED" has
been dropped, as now being taken for granted.
Thank you, respondents. I now feel more comfortable bidding on older, and therefore
affordable, industrial encoders. It seems reasonable to assume that if they function to begin
with, odds are good that they will continue to do so.
Steve Clay-Young
Discussion Thread
scyvt
2007-09-20 16:56:05 UTC
older encoders safe to use?
Bob Muse
2007-09-20 17:06:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] older encoders safe to use?
Jon Elson
2007-09-20 18:04:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] older encoders safe to use?
vrsculptor
2007-09-20 19:27:19 UTC
Re: older encoders safe to use?
Dan Mauch
2007-09-21 06:13:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: older encoders safe to use?
Jon Elson
2007-09-21 10:15:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: older encoders safe to use?
Jon Elson
2007-09-21 10:16:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: older encoders safe to use?
scyvt
2007-09-21 17:01:31 UTC
Re: older encoders safe to use?