Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VisualMill (was BobCAD/CAM)
Posted by
Jack McKie
on 2008-03-11 15:26:26 UTC
Andrew,
The chart on Mecsoft's web shows fairly limited 3D functions. The Pro version has all the bells and whistles. In any event I plan to purchase Visual mill or Rhinocam. I like the stand alone aspect of Visualmill but like the integration of Rhinocam and am having a hard time deciding on which. I have to learn more about the features. Do you use Rhino/Rhinocam?
Jack
Andrew Werby <andrew@...> wrote:
1l. Re: BobCAD/CAM
Posted by: "Jack McKie" freshwatermodels@... freshwatermodels
Date: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:09 pm ((PDT))
Shawn,
If you can afford Mastercam go for it and don't look back. I am learning Rhino and love it. I plan to use Visualmill as a cam but it is only 2.5D though they offer a more $ which supports more axis. Much depends on your wallet and what you want to accomplish. If $ was no object I would get Mastercam and continue to use Rhino.
Jack
[It seems you've been misinformed, Jack. The base version of VisualMill is a 3d program; it also does 2.5d. The 4-axis module costs more, but that's to support an additional rotary axis parallel to X; something that's not necessary for 3d milling (although it's certainly nice to have). Since you like Rhino, you might be interested in RhinoCAM, which is a plug-in that has all the features of VisualMill in the Rhino environment. This makes it easy to make minor changes to the model or machining regions without having to switch programs. There's also a Pro version of VisualMill and RhinoCAM that has a wide range of high-end functions including 4th axis support, as well as various remachining options. I think it competes pretty well with MasterCAM feature for feature, although its price is lower.]
Andrew Werby
www.computersculpture.com
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
The chart on Mecsoft's web shows fairly limited 3D functions. The Pro version has all the bells and whistles. In any event I plan to purchase Visual mill or Rhinocam. I like the stand alone aspect of Visualmill but like the integration of Rhinocam and am having a hard time deciding on which. I have to learn more about the features. Do you use Rhino/Rhinocam?
Jack
Andrew Werby <andrew@...> wrote:
1l. Re: BobCAD/CAM
Posted by: "Jack McKie" freshwatermodels@... freshwatermodels
Date: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:09 pm ((PDT))
Shawn,
If you can afford Mastercam go for it and don't look back. I am learning Rhino and love it. I plan to use Visualmill as a cam but it is only 2.5D though they offer a more $ which supports more axis. Much depends on your wallet and what you want to accomplish. If $ was no object I would get Mastercam and continue to use Rhino.
Jack
[It seems you've been misinformed, Jack. The base version of VisualMill is a 3d program; it also does 2.5d. The 4-axis module costs more, but that's to support an additional rotary axis parallel to X; something that's not necessary for 3d milling (although it's certainly nice to have). Since you like Rhino, you might be interested in RhinoCAM, which is a plug-in that has all the features of VisualMill in the Rhino environment. This makes it easy to make minor changes to the model or machining regions without having to switch programs. There's also a Pro version of VisualMill and RhinoCAM that has a wide range of high-end functions including 4th axis support, as well as various remachining options. I think it competes pretty well with MasterCAM feature for feature, although its price is lower.]
Andrew Werby
www.computersculpture.com
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Andrew Werby
2008-03-11 13:53:55 UTC
Re: VisualMill (was BobCAD/CAM)
Jack McKie
2008-03-11 15:26:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VisualMill (was BobCAD/CAM)
Andrew Werby
2008-03-12 13:31:10 UTC
Re: VisualMill (was BobCAD/CAM)
Peter Reilley
2008-03-12 19:57:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VisualMill (was BobCAD/CAM)
Andrew Werby
2008-03-13 12:07:02 UTC
Re: VisualMill (was BobCAD/CAM)
gawnca
2008-03-14 07:23:09 UTC
Re: VisualMill (was BobCAD/CAM)
Peter Reilley
2008-03-14 08:02:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VisualMill (was BobCAD/CAM)
Jack McKie
2008-03-14 16:40:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VisualMill (was BobCAD/CAM)