Re: interface board
Posted by
garfield@x...
on 1999-05-09 23:17:19 UTC
On Sun, 09 May 1999 23:56:22 -0500, Jon Elson <jmelson@...>
wrote:
and adapting optics. Fine if it's my avocation, but it's not. I DO
appreciate the rundown on the basic simplicity of 'quad' via optics, but
I wanna make parts, not develop sensors and so-forth. It's just sad that
HP doesn't see the value of a 250 X 4 sensor array. If they did, then US
Digital would make the optics post-haste, and it'd be a done deal.
Me, I got other fish to fry. Sad (maybe) but true, life is short. B)
Gar
wrote:
>actually, you can make the whole works yourself, if you can get theYeah, but honestly, I don't have time nor patience to be making sensors
>grating.
and adapting optics. Fine if it's my avocation, but it's not. I DO
appreciate the rundown on the basic simplicity of 'quad' via optics, but
I wanna make parts, not develop sensors and so-forth. It's just sad that
HP doesn't see the value of a 250 X 4 sensor array. If they did, then US
Digital would make the optics post-haste, and it'd be a done deal.
Me, I got other fish to fry. Sad (maybe) but true, life is short. B)
Gar
Discussion Thread
Steve Lindsay
1999-05-08 18:10:15 UTC
Re: interface board
garfield@x...
1999-05-08 23:52:42 UTC
Re: interface board
Steve Lindsay
1999-05-09 08:00:50 UTC
Re: interface board
garfield@x...
1999-05-09 09:15:18 UTC
Re: interface board
Jon Elson
1999-05-09 21:56:22 UTC
Re: interface board
garfield@x...
1999-05-09 23:17:19 UTC
Re: interface board
Jon Elson
1999-05-10 11:55:16 UTC
Re: interface board
garfield@x...
1999-05-10 17:31:34 UTC
Re: interface board