Re: Digest Number 56

NIST doesn't allow access to archives of its mailing list to anyone outside
NIST. Unless you were with that list from the very begining, you probably
missed some important discussions. On the contrary, Onelist, as you all
know, lets us all access the list archives. Seems pretty unambiquous,
really.
If it ain't broke, et cetera, et cetera

Patrick

>Message: 13
> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 23:58:24 -0700
> From: garfield@... (Gar Willis)
>Subject: Re: List question
>
>On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 00:37:52 -0600, "Tim Goldstein"
><timg@...> wrote:
>
>>Actually, Fred Proctor (the honcho that is in charge of EMC over at the
>>NIST) posted to the EMC list that they should subscribe here as there was
>>more active discussion on EMC subjects here.(heavy paraphrase of his
>>posting)
>
>Good heavens, now WHY would he do a thing like that?? Oh well, I guess
>it works both ways, eh? But IF that's the case, that's perhaps mutha
>naicha's way of suggesting that the focus of a purely EMC list is
>sub-optimally narrow? But geez, how can that be?; EMC alone is no
>smallish puppy, in itself. Guess I dunno.
>
>It's a problem similar to evolution maybe, that shows just how much
>diversity or focus is the best balance. A successful organism is a
>flexible one. Heh.
>
>Gar
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>ONElist: the best source for group communications.
>http://www.onelist.com
>Join a new list today!
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@..., an unmodulated list for the

discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.

>To Unsubscribe:
> http://www.onelist.com/unsubscribe/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>bill, List Manager
>