Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] UHU Servo Hardware DIY

on 2012-01-13 05:15:59 UTC

Hi,
I've developed a alternative/upgrade module to the original UHU-chip.

The module is pin-compatible with the original ATTiny2313
microcontroller so it can be used as an alternative to the original chip
on new and existing designs.

More info can be found at:
http://www.henriksplace.se/servo/index.html

I have a newer revision of the manual which hasn't made its way onto the
website yet, I'll try to upload it later today. Let me know if you have
any questions.

Personally I'm running the HP-UHU version of the drive on a 130VDC bus
but have run benchtests at 160VDC.

/Henrik.

On 13 jan 2012 13:20 "mikep_95133" <mikep_95133@...> wrote:

>
>
> Very nice Lester! So many things that can be monitored and adjusted! I
> like that! 150v option is great. Can I use my 200v parts?
>
> Mike
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO%40yahoogroups.com>, Lester Caine <lester@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Mike Phillips wrote:
> > > I am wondering if anyone has either an electronic or hard copy of
> > > the
> > > web pages from the old Servo Lite site. Some of the info was just
> > > great.
> >
> > Don't know if it's of interest, but
> > <http://www.uhu-servo.de/servo_en/index.htm>
> > is still available and there are a few options on PCB's for it. I am
> > currently
> > working on a 'UK' version of the parts list using the EAS version of
> > the board.
> > I think that the comment about gecho prices making it a little
> > academic is
> > probably true, but being able to build one's own electronics can be
> > satisfying.
> > Mind you the board has been sitting here for a couple of years ...
> >
> > --
> > Lester Caine - G8HFL
> > -----------------------------
> > Contact - <http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact>
> > L.S.Caine Electronic Services - <http://lsces.co.uk>
> > EnquirySolve - <http://enquirysolve.com/>
> > Model Engineers Digital Workshop - <http://medw.co.uk//>
> > Firebird - <http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php>
> >
>
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Discussion Thread